Jump to content

Talk:Newark Liberty International Airport Station

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled

[edit]

Whatever happened to the Continental Airlines counter at the station? Is that still being used? Wl219 09:34, 12 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

"No parking lot at the station"

[edit]

This phrase probably deserves an asterisk. What you see there are fenced-off hotel and off-site airport parking lots, but it's not too hard to imagine access being easy if there were no fence and a clear path! 68.37.254.48 (talk) 04:08, 5 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

"Station" per the agencies that own, operate, and use it

[edit]
  • PANYNJ :Newark Liberty International Airport Station "To and From Newark". panynj.gov. Retrieved 13 November 2015.
  • NJT :Newark International Airport Station "Newark Airport". njtransit.com. Retrieved 13 November 2015.
  • Amtrak: Newark Liberty International Airport Rail Station "Newark Liberty International Airport, NJ Train Station (EWR) - Amtrak". amtrak.com. Retrieved 13 November 2015.

Wikipedia:Naming conventions (US stations)

[edit]

Wikipedia:Naming conventions (US stations) clearly states that proper name should be used. Djflem (talk) 19:58, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The convention that you just cited defers to the reliable source. Looking back at numerous discussions about this, including one that is about "Should the USSTATION capitalization advice be adhered to, using reliable sources for what is an official station name?" However, and I say this very carefully, Amtrak does not have a preference to capitalize "station" in its station names. epicgenius (talk) 21:02, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

B or C class article?

[edit]

Per Wikipedia:Content assessment: B-class: The article is mostly complete and without major problems, but requires some further work to reach good article standards. Readers are not left wanting, although the content may not be complete enough to satisfy a serious student or researcher.

One can say that this is true of this article, which has sufficient references cited. Thus, meets C-class, at least.Djflem (talk) 10:28, 6 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]