Talk:New wave of new wave
Appearance
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
It is requested that a photograph be included in this article to improve its quality.
Wikipedians in the United Kingdom may be able to help! The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
Sources
[edit]Should anyone doubt that this was a genuinely widely-covered genre, as the recent PROD nomination suggests may be the case, perhaps these sources will help: Encyclopedia of contemporary British Culture, The Guardian, Robert Christgau, NME/The Encyclopedia of Popular Music, CMJ New Music Monthly, CMJ New Music Monthly again, and see also Steven Wells' book Punk: young, loud & snotty : the stories behind the songs.--Michig (talk) 18:27, 17 August 2009 (UTC)
- If that's the case, why has this article persisted in its current unreferenced, pathetic state for 5 bloody years? ---RepublicanJacobiteThe'FortyFive' 01:32, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
- Because nobody has made an effort to add sources to the article, not because they don't exist, and not because the subject isn't notable or encyclopedic.--Michig (talk) 05:35, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
- Is that better? It didn't look like anyone else could be bothered to improve it so I have.--Michig (talk) 16:43, 25 August 2009 (UTC)
Categories:
- C-Class Alternative music articles
- Unknown-importance Alternative music articles
- WikiProject Alternative music articles
- C-Class Rock music articles
- Unknown-importance Rock music articles
- WikiProject Rock music articles
- C-Class music genre articles
- Music genres task force articles
- C-Class United Kingdom articles
- Unknown-importance United Kingdom articles
- WikiProject United Kingdom articles
- Wikipedia requested photographs in the United Kingdom