Talk:New minor forcing
Appearance
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
Fourteen cards
[edit]This example hand: ♠Txxx ♥AJ ♦KTxx ♣KQxx) on which one might not show ones Spades after recieving a 1H response, has fourteen cards. Will in New Haven
Rebid question
[edit]Consider this other example hand:
- ♠ Axxx ♥ KQxx ♦ Jxx ♣ Ax : planning to force to game, in either spades or notrump, (or, remotely possibly, diamonds)
It seems clear to me to rebid 3NT, not 2♣ here. Suppose partner has the other example hand which would have bypassed 1♠ (♠ Txxx ♥ AJ ♦ KTxx ♣ KQx. Do you really want to be in 4♠? And as noted, if partner has ♠ Kxx ♥ AJx ♦ KQTxx ♣ xx, 5♦ is nearly cold, while 3NT is hopeless on a club lead, but can you get there (or to 4♥)? Matchups 18:22, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
Article title
[edit]Should the article title not be New Minor Forcing, i.e. caps on all of the words? Newwhist (talk) 12:25, 10 April 2015 (UTC)