Talk:New Zealand red admiral
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Untitled
[edit]Regarding the NZ Red Admiral, I am with the Monarch Butterfly NZ Trust, an organisation which is very concerned about phone calls from New Zealanders that love the Monarch, to the effect that they (callers) don't see as many Monarchs as they used to. Then, in conversation, they would add that they don't see as many of NZ's other butterflies as they once did. Accordingly the MBNZ Trust is embarking on two surveys this summer - transects of NZ butterflies/diurnal moths and also tagging of Monarch butterflies.
More reports come in every day that there are concerns about the loss of butterflies (pollinators) worldwide - so it seems that our project is timely. We welcome inquiries from other people in NZ who would like to become involved, more information on www.monarch.org.nz.
In our presentations and workshops, we have been describing the Red Admiral (NZ) as Vanessa gonerilla gonerilla - but today were advised by a prominent Landcare entomologist that it is correctly named Bassaris gonerilla - which is correct? We dont want to "mislead" people that we're trying to educate!
Comments welcome - here or by email to the MBNZT. Madambutterfly 01:42, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
- I don't know if you are still watching this page four years later. I am in New Plymouth and see a reasonable number of Monarch butterflies. I have only seen one red admiral and one yellow admiral in the last couple of years. (Of course they are almost impossible to spot if at rest). Ongaonga is hardly the sort of plant that people are likely to encourage, so the admirals are likely suffering from loss of food source. dramatic (talk) 20:10, 15 October 2010 (UTC)
External links modified (February 2018)
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on New Zealand red admiral. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110610013046/http://homepages.ihug.co.nz/~nzbutterfly.info/resident/yellow-admiral/ to http://homepages.ihug.co.nz/~nzbutterfly.info/resident/yellow-admiral/
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090502182406/http://homepages.ihug.co.nz/~nzbutterfly.info/resident/red-admiral/ to http://homepages.ihug.co.nz/~nzbutterfly.info/resident/red-admiral/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:37, 17 February 2018 (UTC)