Talk:New York State Route 990V/GA1

GA Review

GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS):

   Your lead introduces new information not supported by the main prose (highest numbered state highway), can you add this somewhere else in the body?

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

   Image page needs to have more info than just a {{pd-self}} tag on it.

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

   Awaiting improvements --Admrb♉ltz (talk) 21:13, 14 September 2008 (UTC) Changes have been made. Passing --Admrb♉ltz (talk) 21:40, 14 September 2008 (UTC)