Talk:New York State Route 65/GA1
GA Review
[edit]| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: AdmrBoltz 23:20, 26 February 2011 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references):
b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): 
- a (references):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail:
Comments
[edit]- "3 miles (5 km) to the north of Honeoye Falls" - new sentences should not start with numbers.
- Also, that sentence is a run on.
- Revised slightly. – TMF 01:35, 27 February 2011 (UTC)
- Also, that sentence is a run on.
- "New York State Thruway (Interstate 90 or I-90)." - is there a need to mention Interstate 90 at all here?
- Why shouldn't it be? – TMF 01:35, 27 February 2011 (UTC)
- It seems redundant, but its not a reason to hold the GA. --AdmrBoltz 01:41, 27 February 2011 (UTC)
- How is it redundant? A casual reader from Kingston who isn't brushed up on their geography could read this article, see the Thruway link, and assume it was I-87. – TMF 01:43, 27 February 2011 (UTC)
- True, then since you do not refer to I-90 anywhere else drop just the I-90 portion and leave just the linked Interstate 90. --AdmrBoltz 02:18, 27 February 2011 (UTC)
- Now that I can agree with. Done. – TMF 02:32, 27 February 2011 (UTC)
- True, then since you do not refer to I-90 anywhere else drop just the I-90 portion and leave just the linked Interstate 90. --AdmrBoltz 02:18, 27 February 2011 (UTC)
- How is it redundant? A casual reader from Kingston who isn't brushed up on their geography could read this article, see the Thruway link, and assume it was I-87. – TMF 01:43, 27 February 2011 (UTC)
- It seems redundant, but its not a reason to hold the GA. --AdmrBoltz 01:41, 27 February 2011 (UTC)
- Why shouldn't it be? – TMF 01:35, 27 February 2011 (UTC)
- "CSX Transportation-owned West Shore Subdivision" - doesn't seem to be supported by the Y! Maps reference.
- I sincerely question if this claim even needs a reference. It's hardly controversial and I doubt anyone would ever call it into question. The other alternative here is to just say the road passes over a railroad line, and I think doing so detracts from the quality of the article. – TMF 01:35, 27 February 2011 (UTC)
- Fair enough. --AdmrBoltz 01:41, 27 February 2011 (UTC)
- I sincerely question if this claim even needs a reference. It's hardly controversial and I doubt anyone would ever call it into question. The other alternative here is to just say the road passes over a railroad line, and I think doing so detracts from the quality of the article. – TMF 01:35, 27 February 2011 (UTC)