Talk:New York State Route 45/GA1

GA Review

GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS):

   km should be rounded to the tenth (or hundredth, as in the infobox), not the nearest whole number. "NY 45 is a relatively quiet road" - I'm not sure what this means. If it means relatively fewer cars based on AADT numbers, say that explicitly. :-D "Traffic here tends to pile up many times a day." - subjective. Cite a news source, or remove. "During the 1960s, the New York State Department of Transportation (NYSDOT) noticed a population boom in Rockland County." - poorly worded... maybe they reacted to the complaints of residents (the same ones who later cancelled the bypass), but if they were being proactive, cite a source (or use the one given) and say so.

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

   See above

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

   Half the mileposts are missing... why?

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

   Not bad so far! Good luck!

Done - I believe I've solved it all.Mitch32^(UP) 00:49, 2 July 2008 (UTC)

Got it, looks good. —Rob (talk) 14:27, 2 July 2008 (UTC)