Talk:New York State Route 429

New York State Route 429 has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
December 11, 2010	Good article nominee	Listed

U.S. Roads: State highways / New York Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of the U.S. Roads WikiProject, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to state highways and other major roads in the United States. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.U.S. RoadsWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. RoadsTemplate:WikiProject U.S. RoadsU.S. road transport articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Topics

U.S. state highways

Locations

New York

This article has a map. If the file has an error, please work with the Maps department to correct it.

This article has a junction list compliant with the Manual of Style on road junction lists.

This article has a KML file. If the file has an error, please work with the Maps department to correct it.

Article recognition:

	This article was the Selected article of the New York Roads Portal in January 2012.

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:New York State Route 429/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Dough 48 72 05:02, 11 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for criteria)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): b (MoS):
The sentence "Though relatively minor in length, NY 429 nevertheless enjoys regional importance for not only connecting North Tonawanda and some of the county's interior regions, but also for the sweeping view it offers as it descends the Niagara Escarpment near its northern end." sounds awkward. The phrase "a striking departure from the rural fields that have predominated up to Sanborn" needs to be reworded.
Motion seconded, so ordered.
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
Is any historical information from after 1935 available?
Not really. Added a note to the end of the history saying as much.
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:
Pass/Fail:

A couple of fixes and this article should be ready. Dough 48 72 05:02, 11 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Replied above. – T M F 05:25, 11 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I will now pass the article. Dough 48 72 05:26, 11 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]