Talk:New York State Route 361/GA1

GA Review

GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS):

   I would prefer one single paragraph in the lead (and I believe this short an article can bear a one-paragraphed lead). I would also like to see the year 1946 in the lead. In the history section, there is one very long sentence (five lines on my screen) that needs to be split up into shorter pieces.

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

   The article is very short—but I guess there isn't much to say about a 3.9 km road, so it will suffice.

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

   On hold until the minor issues have been dealt with. Arsenikk ^(talk) 13:23, 16 September 2008 (UTC)

   Seeing as the route is/was in my area, I might as well help out. Done with everything. –Juliancolton ^{Tropical Cyclone} 13:51, 16 September 2008 (UTC)

   Then I see no other choice than to pass it with pleasure. Arsenikk ^(talk) 14:35, 16 September 2008 (UTC)