Jump to content

Talk:New York State Route 31E

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleNew York State Route 31E has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Good topic starNew York State Route 31E is part of the New York State Route 31 series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
December 1, 2010Good article nomineeListed
December 17, 2010Good topic candidatePromoted
Current status: Good article

Change of Intersection Template

[edit]

This article was changed to bring its intersection template to the NYint format. No other changes were made. It is important to verify, update and/or correct as necessary.Fwgoebel 16:46, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:New York State Route 31E/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Racepacket (talk) 11:43, 1 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for criteria)

This is a nice piece of work, congratulations.

  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:

Congratulatins. Racepacket (talk) 11:58, 1 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]