Talk:New York State Route 318/GA1

GA Review

GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS):

   Prose is actually pretty good. Could always use some brushing-up, though. However, the lead needs to be expanded.

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

   Seems like 10 miles should have more RD.

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

   Nice images, good captions.

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

Pretty good article here. Just expand the lead and check if there's any more RD and you should be good-to-go. Juliancolton ^{Tropical Cyclone} 17:53, 29 May 2008 (UTC)

Everything's been fixed, passes GA. 18:16, 29 May 2008 (UTC)