Talk:New York State Route 3/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose): b (MoS):
- Are we okay here with using "interchange" as a verb? I never have, but I'm not about to say no one else can.
- a (prose): b (MoS):
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars etc.:
- No edit wars etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Consider adding an image of the historical alignment and adding it into the History section for bonus FA points.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Thorough, and with comparatively good prose (considering I've read a lot of articles in the past 3 days) to boot. Congrats! —Rob (talk) 22:17, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
- Pass/Fail: