Talk:New York State Route 28/GA

GA review

GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS):

   "After crossing the Delaware River, NY 28 ends its concurrency with NY 30 and NY 28 is called Palmer Hill." -- as in, the road is called "Palmer Hill"? "3 route junction" might need to become "three-route junction".

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

   Are First Lake... etc. all villages, or lakes?

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

   Two of the pictures have watermarks. The use of watermarks is discouraged on Wikipedia, so a search for suitable replacement should be done as soon as possible. A couple of the captions need their periods dropped.

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

Nice work so far! —Rob (talk) 19:48, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

Everything has been fixed if I'm correct. Also the numbered lakes are just lakes. As far as I know, none are villages.^Mitch32^contribs 20:13, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

Excellent. Thanks to TMF and Polaron and all for the quick replies. —Rob (talk) 20:59, 17 April 2008 (UTC)