Talk:New York State Route 268/GA1
GA Review
[edit]Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
I guess I'll take this one too :) The full review will be up soon. Dana boomer (talk) 21:06, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose):
b (MoS):
- a (prose):
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- a (references):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars etc.:
- No edit wars etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail:
Everything looks good here, so I'm going to pass this article as well. My only comment would be that you use convert templates in the body, but not in the lead, so you probably want to standardize that. That's not enough to even both with holding the GA for though, so nice work and congrats on another GA! Dana boomer (talk) 21:19, 13 November 2008 (UTC)