Talk:New York State Route 250/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Imzadi 1979 → 03:18, 3 March 2011 (UTC)

GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

   Only one thing needed tweaking, and I did that myself. Other things could be worded differently, but that is a matter of personal style and preference, not bad quality.

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

   Looks good here.

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

   Ok here.

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

   Do highway articles in general have issues here?

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

   Only signs of normal editing here.

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

   All good here.

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

   Overall, meets the criteria for a pass. Imzadi 1979 → 04:24, 3 March 2011 (UTC)