Talk:New York State Route 146B/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Hi! I will be reviewing this article for GA status, and should have the full review up soon. Dana boomer (talk) 20:38, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose): b (MoS):
- In the History section, you say "The area along the Mohawk River was popular with ferries across the highway" I'm really not sure what you're trying to say here, can you please reword?
- a (prose): b (MoS):
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars etc.:
- No edit wars etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail:
Just one prose issue, so I'm putting the article on hold. Let me know if you have any questions. Dana boomer (talk) 21:01, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
- Done. :) -Mitch32(UP) 21:05, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
- Everything looks good, so I'm passing the article. Nice work, and thanks again for the prompt response. Dana boomer (talk) 21:25, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
- Done. :) -Mitch32(UP) 21:05, 3 November 2008 (UTC)