Jump to content

Talk:New York State Route 118

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Change of Intersection Template

[edit]

This article was changed to bring its intersection template to the NYint format. No other changes were made. It is important to verify, update and/or correct as necessary.Fwgoebel 22:21, 30 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:New York State Route 118/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Admrboltz (talk · contribs) 17:38, 12 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, no copyvios, spelling and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:

Looks good, just a few housekeeping items before passing. --AdmrBoltz 17:55, 12 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Prose

[edit]
  • With your 1905/7 amounts, can you use the {{inflation}} template to provide more current amounts?
  • The jct list needs a key / footer.

Images

[edit]
Still hate that inflation template. If these template upgrades don't make that easier, protest will ensue. Everything is changed for the record. Also, may I ask leaving my GANs alone, personal preference and request at WT:USRD that USRD editors abstain from reviewing my articles. Mitch32(New digs, new life, same old stubborn.) 20:02, 12 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Looks good to me. Would you prefer if I put out for a second opinion, or would you like me to pass it.? --AdmrBoltz 20:09, 12 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Pass it, just a note for the future. Mitch32(New digs, new life, same old stubborn.) 22:06, 12 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Pass --AdmrBoltz 22:07, 12 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]