Talk:New York State Route 111
Appearance
New York State Route 111 has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: July 8, 2013. (Reviewed version). |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:New York State Route 111/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Khazar2 (talk · contribs) 15:46, 5 July 2013 (UTC)
I'll be glad to take this review. Initial comments to follow in the next 1-5 days. Thanks in advance for your work on this one! -- Khazar2 (talk) 15:46, 5 July 2013 (UTC)
On a first pass, I don't see any issues. The sourcing is a bit weak in terms of notability but not unreliable. Will do the checklist now. -- Khazar2 (talk) 00:57, 8 July 2013 (UTC)
Rate | Attribute | Review Comment |
---|---|---|
1. Well-written: | ||
1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct. | ||
1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation. | ||
2. Verifiable with no original research: | ||
2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline. | ||
2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose). | ||
2c. it contains no original research. | ||
3. Broad in its coverage: | ||
3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic. | ||
3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style). | ||
4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each. | ||
5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute. | ||
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio: | ||
6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content. | ||
6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions. | ||
7. Overall assessment. | Pass as GA |
Categories:
- Wikipedia good articles
- Engineering and technology good articles
- GA-Class New York (state) articles
- Unknown-importance New York (state) articles
- GA-Class U.S. state highway articles
- Mid-importance U.S. state highway articles
- GA-Class Road transport articles
- Mid-importance Road transport articles
- U.S. state highway articles
- GA-Class New York road transport articles
- Mid-importance New York road transport articles
- New York state highway articles
- WikiProject U.S. Roads subproject selected articles
- GA-Class U.S. road transport articles
- Mid-importance U.S. road transport articles
- U.S. road transport articles