Talk:New York Press

Newspapers Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Newspapers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Newspapers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NewspapersWikipedia:WikiProject NewspapersTemplate:WikiProject NewspapersNewspapers articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Journalism Low‑importance

	Journalism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Journalism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of journalism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JournalismWikipedia:WikiProject JournalismTemplate:WikiProject JournalismJournalism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

New York (state) Low‑importance

	New York (state) portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York (state), a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of New York on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York (state)Wikipedia:WikiProject New York (state)Template:WikiProject New York (state)New York (state) articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Matt Taibbi

Should include information from the Matt Taibbi article: Taibbi left the NY Press in August 2005, shortly after his editor Jeff Koyen had quit in an unrelated disagreement with the paper's publisher Chris Rohland

New Articles

Created four stubs about prominent NYP writers mentioned in this article-including the four who resigned en masse during the Mohammed cartoon controversy-within the past few days.

There should probably also be an article about The Blade and Ward Sutton as well. Ruthfulbarbarity 00:01, 17 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:COVER437.jpg

Image:COVER437.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:02, 2 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

writers

There is no policy that it is necessary for an author to be notable enough for a personal Wikipedia article to be included in article content, when pertinent and sourced.I have therefore restored the information about the contributions of some writers that was just removed here. Please discuss and get consensus before deleting it again. DGG (talk) 08:45, 9 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Alan Cabal per WP:BRD

I recently removed the link and reference to Alan Cabal from this article after his own article was deleted due to lack of notability. I came here to remove the red link, but found he was only included in a list of notable writers for NYP. As notability couldn't be established at AfD/DRV (linked from the redlink above) I decided to simply remove his name. DGG reverted my edit, so I thought it would be best to open the floor. I feel as he isn't notable that his name probably shouldn't be included, but I don't feel strongly. I have though removed the red link. What do regular editors here think? Yours, Verbal chat 10:39, 9 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

notability is not the test for inclusion in an article, just for having a separate article. As for delinking the name, certainly. I should have done it when I restored the material, but I didn't think of it. Given various discussion on a remarkably wide variety of places, probably this problem should be deferred until it can be seen whether or not there actually will be an article after all. But the principle applies to the other people mentioned there without articles also. My own view is that sufficiently major contributors should be at least mentioned. DGG (talk) 05:26, 10 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Cleanup

Claims of influence on The Village Voice were unsourced, so I removed them. One of them had a citation, but it the article turned out to merely be a story about how The Village Voice was converting to a free model. It had absolutely nothing in it about the New York Press. If someone can find a source that says that the Press was the reason why the Voice converted to a free model, then it can obviously be added back. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 20:11, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on New York Press. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060115234857/http://www.nydailynews.com/03-04-2005/front/story/286529p-245325c.html to http://www.nydailynews.com/03-04-2005/front/story/286529p-245325c.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:57, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on New York Press. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:00, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on New York Press. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:55, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (February 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on New York Press. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:41, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]