Talk:New York Life Building/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Kingsif (talk · contribs) 21:44, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm Kingsif, and I'll be doing this review. This is an automated message that helps keep the bot updating the nominated article's talkpage working and allows me to say hi. Feel free to reach out and, if you think the review has gone well, I have some open GA nominations that you could (but are under no obligation to) look at. Kingsif (talk) 21:44, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Good Article review progress box

Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV ()

3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant ()

Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed

History and talk clear
Infobox good
Images licensed well
Earwig fine
reliable sources, and a wide selection of coverage
Inline citations look good
Lead satis
In the first sentence of the body, perhaps replace "it" with the name of the building?
- Done
Should 'louvered' have a wikilink?
- Done
bronze ornamental grills - should this be 'grilles'?
- Done
MSG hasn't been established as an acronym for Madison Square Garden before it's used along, could it be added next to the full name
- Done, I guess, though the article already had the text "first Madison Square Garden (MSG)". epicgenius (talk) 22:45, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Should ref [57] be outside the bracket?
- Done
What is woolen firms?
- Fixed
Real giant candle?
- An artificial one. epicgenius (talk) 22:45, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Overall

on hold I may have missed some commas, but issues are minor. Kingsif (talk) 22:32, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- @Kingsif: Thanks, I have done these. epicgenius (talk) 22:45, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  - Thanks, pass this one, too. Kingsif (talk) 22:48, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]