Talk:New York Jets/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Joe Gazz84^user•_talk•^contribs•_{Editor Review} 14:54, 25 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for criteria)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): b (MoS):
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:
Pass/Fail:

I would like top see some more reliable sourcing. The quantity is good but the majority of the sources are from the same place. On Wikipedia it is mandatory that there are many different sources from a variety of places and a variety of material. The sources are the main part of the issue here. The review is put on hold until there are more verifiable other sources. Please place {{done}} next to the item below when the issue has been resolved. Another issue though is that text only needs to Wiki Linked on its first appearance. Such as New York Jets do not need to be wikilinked 3 times only on the first appearance. Joe Gazz84^user•_talk•^contribs•_{Editor Review} 15:21, 25 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for criteria)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): b (MoS):
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:
Pass/Fail:

This article cleaned up nicely and is ready for good article status. Joe Gazz84^user•_talk•^contribs•_{Editor Review} 22:29, 26 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]