Talk:New York City/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Mrt3366 (talk · contribs) 16:29, 24 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Checklist

Rate	Attribute	Review Comment
1. Well-written:
	1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct.
	1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation.	acceptable, a little overlinking in the lead though.
2. Verifiable with no original research:
	2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline.	"Early history" needs some inline citations. Doesn't seem like a grave issue though.
	2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose).
	2c. it contains no original research.	"Early history" needs attention in this regard but I wouldn't call it "original research"(not likely to be challenged) these are mostly verifiable.
3. Broad in its coverage:
	3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic.
	3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).
	4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.
	5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
	6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content.	A commendable collection in this context.
	6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.
	7. Overall assessment.	To summarize my views in one line, yes there are scattered issues here and there but they are all surmountable, this article should pass GA.

Mr T ^(Talk?) ^{(New thread?)} 16:29, 24 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]