Talk:New World Order (professional wrestling)/Archive 2

nWo Championship

If anyone feels that this image violates copyright please delete it. It was created to represent the vandalized version of the WCW Championship. The hyperlink for the image is here. User: Big Boss 0 01:21, 12 December 2006 (UTC) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:NWO_Championship.JPG[reply]

There also needs to be a title history section for the NWO. I know all of you agree with me.--Prince Patrick 15:43, 2 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WWF Incarnations

Is it really necessarry to list a new "incarnation" of the nWo each time a member left or joined the group? That wasn't done with the WCW versions. As far as I'm concerned there was only 1 version in the WWF with a roster that changed from time to time. 74.139.205.189 16:43, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Good point, changed.«»bd(^talk _stalk) 18:18, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It looks like it wasn't changed.--Prince Patrick 15:44, 2 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Great Muta

Great Muta was also a part of the real nWo, not just nWo Japan. For proof, [[1]]. Mwutz 23:55, 24 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, and so were Tenzan and Chono. All three men made appearances on Nitro, Thunder, and Saturday Night throughout 1997-98 67.86.39.180 20:52, 2 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I think the article should mention that the nWo and nWo Japan were not mutually exclusive. Mwutz 21:22, 4 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Rockhouse

Does anyone know where I can download the nwo rockhouse theme song? 207.69.137.6 21:37, 4 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The talk page is to discuss the article. Mwutz 00:00, 6 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

dMp

There needs to be a correction to the last part; dMp doesn't stand for "Destruction, Mayhem, and Pain", it stands for "Damon (or "Demon") Making Plant". The "Destruction..." line is a line from the dub (which is riddled with errors). You can see the full "Damon Making Plant" line in some of the Ultimate Muscle video games, paticularly the GBA one.

nWo Origins

Wasn't the "nWo" a cheap ripoff of something George H W Bush dreamed up while he was in office? I seem to recall a connection. 69.250.29.104 21:26, 7 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

TNA "Invasion"

This section really has no business in this article. There's no connection to the nWo at all and takes up more space than the entry on D-Generation X

Title History

This page needs a nWo title section badly. Vermon CaTaffy 8

No, it doesn't. The nWo never had its own titles, and even if they had, as it wasn't actually an independent promotion from WCW, they would properly be listed in the title histories in the main WCW article. Rdfox 76 02:14, 16 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I don’t think Vermon CaTaffy 8 was talking about “N.W.O. Titles”. I think he/she was talking about title history for the N.W.O. members.--Prince Patrick 16:25, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Which, properly, belongs in the WCW article's title histories section, and, for each individual member, can be found in his individual article. Besides, all the significant title wins and losses for the nWo are mentioned in the angle description already; creating a "title history" for the group would be largely redundant, and would make what's already an article at the upper limits of the recommended length range even longer.

What might be useful, though, would be if we could confirm dates for each member joining and leaving the group, and post them alongside their names in the membership roster, so that someone who's curious as to what titles they won while with the nWo would have it easier finding out. I don't have the time or the tapes needed to do this, but maybe someone else out there does? Rdfox 76 20:27, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I think a title history section like the one on the Four Horsemen and the DX page should be good enough. A listing of titles won while in the faction should be good and the dates and places, etc., are not really necessary.--Prince Patrick 19:36, 18 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:NWo 2000.jpg

Image:NWo 2000.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:43, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Nworedwhite.jpg

Image:Nworedwhite.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:18, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Outsiders2.jpg

Image:Outsiders2.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:29, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Outsiders-1.jpg

Image:Outsiders-1.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:29, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Original-nWo.jpg

Image:Original-nWo.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:46, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]