Jump to content

Talk:New Slang/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: DepressedPer (talk · contribs) 09:11, 13 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I'll be taking the position of reviewing this article. Give me a week to look this over and I'll give you my thoughts on what needs to be done to move it to GA-class.

Here's what I found:

  • Infobox issues: What's the song's genre? Wikilink Sub Pop.
  • Sensing some WP:OVERCITE in "Background" with Ref. 1.
  • "calling the song a "masterpiece," → "called the song a "masterpiece,"
  • Rm wikilink for Pitchfork Media in the third sentence.
  • WP:OVERCITE in "Music video" with Refs. 4 and 14.
  • More WP:OVERCITE in "Commercial performance and usage" with Ref. 20.
  • Rm '(SNL)' from "Saturday Night Live (SNL) in 2007."
  • Add these two Discogs refs for the formats: [1] and [2].
  • Refs. 1, 18 and 20: The publisher is Spin Media.
  • Refs. 3 and 19: The publisher is Carl Petersen.
  • Ref. 4: The publisher is Albuquerque Publishing Company.
  • Ref. 5: Allmusic → AllMusic (found this in "Reception"); Its publisher is All Media Network.
  • Ref. 8: The publisher is Arthur Ochs Sulzberger, Jr..
  • Ref. 9: The publisher is The Onion.
  • Ref. 13: The publisher's the same as Ref. 6.
  • Ref. 14: The publisher is Time Inc..
  • Ref. 15: The publisher is Frank A. Blethen.
  • Ref. 21: No italics on American Songwriter.

The rest of the article is written pretty for the most part. I'll put this on hold so you can fix the problems mentioned above. Nice work. DepressedPer (talk) 02:55, 20 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hey there - I've edited the article accordingly. One small thing: I've been instructed in the past not to add Discogs links (even though it's a reliable site, some don't view it as such) so I'll leave it as is for now. Thanks for the review. Saginaw-hitchhiker (talk) 16:21, 20 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I see where your coming from with the Discogs links, just a minor thing. Article looks good to pass it as a GA. DepressedPer (talk) 14:31, 20 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.