Talk:New Right (Netherlands)

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Political parties task force.

Netherlands

This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Netherlands, an attempt to create, expand, and improve articles related to the Netherlands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, visit the project page where you can join the project or contribute to the discussion.NetherlandsWikipedia:WikiProject NetherlandsTemplate:WikiProject NetherlandsNetherlands articles

Untitled

There has been some controversy on the following section.

Like other nationalist parties, the party is accused of racism and neo-fascism. The party itself rejects this label, however, in 2004, a photograph surfaced of Smit meeting with friends while a White Power flag is clearly present in the room. Another picture taken at the same party shows a Nazi-helmet, including a Swastika symbol. [1] . The party itself rejects this label.

I don't think it is unencyclopedic because it violates WP:NOR. -- C mon 23:12, 8 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The implication that is made here is incorrect: it does not follow from this photograph that New Right has a neo-Nazi ideology. So instead, you need to find someone who does make this implication, someone who says "A implies B," and insert it then in a critism section on the New Right. Intangible 23:29, 8 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Once again, there is no implication being made in itself; rather, I pointed out that there was controversy surrounding Smit's ideological background when the series of photographs appeared on several weblogs. In my last edit I already put it under the different sub-header "controversy"; not that I neccesarily think it does not belong under the ideology header, but as a compromise.

--The Proletarian 12:21, 9 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

RfC

BAn RfC: Which descriptor, if any, can be added in front of Southern Poverty Law Center when referenced in other articles? has been posted at the Southern Poverty Law Center talk page. Your participation is welcomed. – MrX 17:05, 22 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on New Right (Netherlands). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120402144105/http://www.elsevier.nl/web/Nieuws/Politiek/157665/Kamp-Zet-criminele-allochtonen-het-land-uit.htm to http://www.elsevier.nl/web/Nieuws/Politiek/157665/Kamp-Zet-criminele-allochtonen-het-land-uit.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:10, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]