Talk:New Organizing Institute

This article was nominated for deletion on April 17 2014. The result of the discussion was speedy deleted.

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Sources for expansion

There was previously an article on NOI, which was deleted. Here are the sources that were used for that article -- potentially useful for expansion here:

Blue Mass Group, Washington Post Blog Network, 12:39 AM ET, 09/10/2010 http://voices.washingtonpost.com/politics/blog-network/2010/09/massachusetts_organizers_guide.html
http://www.digitaljournal.com/pr/187476
Fullenwider, Kyla. Good Magazine. 5:30am 7/28/2010 http://www.good.is/post/q-a-a-west-point-for-community-organizing/
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/12/06/opinion/i-am-not-big-brother.html
~~http://www.nytimes.com/2013/02/17/magazine/can-the-republicans-be-saved-from-obsolescence.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0~~ (already in use)
~~http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/politics/2013/12/rootscamp_obamacare_and_democrats_why_progressives_won_t_talk_about_the.html~~ (already in use)

-Pete (talk) 03:11, 17 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nice, thanks! Safehaven86 (talk) 03:13, 17 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. For what it's worth, I also restored the edit history from that earlier version -- in case it's helpful in some way. -Pete (talk) 00:43, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

link

I think the official website link might be wrong. It leads to a marketing company instead of a political organization. Magnigornia (talk) 00:45, 21 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Good catch, thanks. I removed it. Marquardtika (talk) 01:14, 21 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]