Talk:New Negro
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Untitled
[edit]this page needs to be cleaned up. how about more paragraphs?
RE: More like a complete re-write, in particular the last paragraph. Ugh. How about some attention from an expert in the field?
This needs a rewrite and better formatting. It is a solid block of text from top to bottom with little divisions. Also edited out spam from the talk page. 130.126.211.130 (talk) 01:44, 16 December 2008 (UTC)
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
[edit]This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 25 April 2019 and 7 June 2019. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Jacky031128.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 05:12, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Thomas Brooks?
[edit]Who is the ROSA PARKS
referred to in the first sentence?--142.1.146.230 (talk) 21:00, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
There is no Thomas Brooks mentioned anywhere in the article.
I believe this piece is written by an expert, Amritjit Singh. I have seen the same text under his name in a reference book on the Harlem Renaissance.
Azad458 (talk) 19:23, 4 April 2010 (UTC)azad458
Matthew Kotleski Negro League Baseball 'Star' and co-founder of New Negro movement--dubious?
[edit]I have found no trace of any Negro League baseball player by the name Matthew Kotleski; this name is not listed in the Wikipedia list of Negro League baseball players, nor did a Google internet search result in any hits--apart from this very same Wikipedia entry. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.136.165.82 (talk) 08:47, 13 November 2012 (UTC)
- Thanks for pointing this out. I have removed the mention of Kotleski, whose relevance to baseball or the New Negro movement I could not verify. Also, the sentence conflated the movement with the Harlem Renaissance, which is just plain wrong. They're related but not the same thing at all. Rivertorch (talk) 15:01, 13 November 2012 (UTC)
External links modified (February 2018)
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on New Negro. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081222123346/http://cup.columbia.edu/book/978-0-231-13910-6/hubert-harrison/excerpt to http://cup.columbia.edu/book/978-0-231-13910-6/hubert-harrison/excerpt
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:36, 17 February 2018 (UTC)