Jump to content

Talk:New Jersey in the 20th century

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Former good articleNew Jersey in the 20th century was one of the History good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
February 10, 2006Good article nomineeListed
February 25, 2008Good article reassessmentDelisted
Current status: Delisted good article

Additional topics?

[edit]

I've got some ideas about additional topics that we might want to include. Please add to this list. --ChrisRuvolo (t) 20:32, 10 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:HollandTunnelNYNJboarder.JPG

[edit]

Image:HollandTunnelNYNJboarder.JPG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 23:24, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

GA Sweeps Review: Delisted

[edit]

In order to uphold the quality of Wikipedia:Good articles, all articles listed as Good articles are being reviewed against the requirements of the GA criteria as part of the GA project quality task force. I am specifically going over all of the "World History-Americas" articles. Unfortunately, as of February 25, 2008, this article fails to satisfy the criteria. While reviewing the articles, I made several corrections. The article was passed as a GA back in 2006 without a review, and since then, the criteria have changed significantly. The article currently lacks inline citations for multiple statistics that should have them. If you can find sources online, feel free to include those, although book sources are always great. The following are several issues that should be addressed before renominating the article at WP:GAN:

Needs inline citations:

  1. "Standard Oil had controlled nearly 90% of refined oil flows into the United States, having a near complete monopoly upon it."
  2. "In addition, New Jersey became a leading chemical producer worldwide after discovering German secrets."
  3. "New Jersey was also the first state in the United States to ratify Prohibition, which restricted the purchasing and selling of alcohol."
  4. "By 1933, one-tenth of the population were dependent upon the Franklin D. Roosevelt's New Deal."
  5. "Listeners were told that a "huge, flaming object, believed to be a meteorite, fell on a farm in the neighborhood of Grover’s Mill, New Jersey, twenty-two miles from Trenton."" Quotes need inline citations directly after the statement.
  6. "The baby was later found dead."
  7. "He was tried in Flemington, New Jersey in what was known as the "Trial of the Century", and was convicted."
  8. "The mystery novel Murder on the Oriental Express may have been based upon this kidnapping, with events paralleling many of the Lindbergh kidnapping." Needs a source, or may be considered original research.
  9. "Questions and controversy surround the accident to this day: theories for the sudden burst of flames include sabotage against the German Nazis, static buildup, and flammable fabric."
  10. "A German U-boat (U-869) was sunk off the coast of New Jersey in 1945."
  11. "The new State Constitution also returned the right of suffrage to females and blacks."
  12. "Six African American defendants were convicted by an all-white jury and sentenced to death for the murder of an elderly white shopkeeper based on coerced confessions."
  13. "71 stores were damaged and 46 people were injured."
  14. "However, the meeting helped improve the strained relationships between the Soviet Union and the US."
  15. "24 people died in the riots, and nearly 1,600 were arrested. The riots are often cited as a major factor in the decline of Newark and its neighboring communities, as many residents fled to the suburbs following the riots."

Other issues:

  1. The lead needs to be expanded to several paragraphs to better summarize the article, making sure that all of the sections of information are touched on.
  2. "Several Allied ships were sunken off of the coast of New Jersey." This sentence should be rewritten/expanded on to specify its significance.
  3. Is there any information that can be included about events that occurred in the 1980s?
  4. If possible see if there are any related external links that could be added that relate to the topic.

For these reasons, the article has been delisted from WP:GA. However, if improvements are made bringing the article up to standards, the article may be nominated at WP:GAN. If you disagree with this review, you can seek an alternate opinion at Good article reassessment. If you have any questions, let me know on my talk page and I'll get back to you as soon as I can. I have updated the article's history to reflect this review. Happy editing! --Nehrams2020 (talk) 07:59, 26 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on New Jersey in the 20th century. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:21, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:New_Jersey_in_the_20th_century&oldid=1207179736"