Talk:New Jersey Route 92/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Rp0211 (talk · contribs) 20:12, 27 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose):
b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references):
b (citations to reliable sources):
c (OR):
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects):
b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:
Pass/Fail:

Infobox

No issues

Lead

No issues

History

No issues

Proposed alignments

Fix disambiguation issue with "East Windsor" according to this

Proposed interchanges

Source needed to verify information in "Route 92 (Princeton-Hightstown)" subsection

References

No issues

After thoroughly reviewing this article, I have decided to put it on hold at this time. I will give you the general seven days to fix these mistakes and/or address other issues which you believe do not affect good article status. If you have any questions, please feel free to ask. Rp0211 ^(talk2me) 20:23, 27 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

That shouldn't have been there period, someone added it. Fixed the other problems. Mitch32^{(There is a destiny that makes us... family.)} 20:49, 27 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

All issues have been addressed, so I feel confident passing this article. Congratulations and keep up the good work! Rp0211 ^(talk2me) 21:08, 27 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]