Talk:New History Warfare Vol. 3: To See More Light

New History Warfare Vol. 3: To See More Light has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: February 14, 2015. (Reviewed version).

Albums

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AlbumsWikipedia:WikiProject AlbumsTemplate:WikiProject AlbumsAlbum articles

Canada: Music Low‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Canadian music.

Electronic music Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Electronic music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Electronic music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Electronic musicWikipedia:WikiProject Electronic musicTemplate:WikiProject Electronic musicelectronic music articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Jazz Low‑importance

	Jazz portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Jazz, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of jazz on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JazzWikipedia:WikiProject JazzTemplate:WikiProject JazzJazz articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Free Jazz?

No way. Stetson hardly improvises at all during his pieces, as far as I am aware they are very carefully composed and not played with much variation at all between different performances of the same compositions. It's barely even jazz, let alone free jazz. Experimental jazz, maybe. From the little I know about free jazz, improvisation seems basically essential to the genre so I don't think this album could fit. I'll change it to something more appropriate.27.252.121.224 (talk) 12:35, 1 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Fair enough. Thanks for taking the time to post here :) — sparklism ^hey! 14:38, 1 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, we need at least a source there. This isn't jazz, it's drone/minimalist by way of saxophones. 190.185.118.102 (talk) 19:40, 2 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:New History Warfare Vol. 3: To See More Light/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: 3family6 (talk · contribs) 20:18, 3 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

Is it reasonably well written?
A. Prose is "clear and concise", without copyvios, or spelling and grammar errors:
Clear, no copyvios or close paraphrasing, no errors.--3family6 (Talk to me | See what I have done) 17:15, 14 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
Follows MOS.--3family6 (Talk to me | See what I have done) 17:15, 14 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
A. Has an appropriate reference section:
Well-formatted reference section.--3family6 (Talk to me | See what I have done) 17:15, 14 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

B. Citations to reliable sources, where necessary:
Plenty of citations to reliable sources.--3family6 (Talk to me | See what I have done) 17:15, 14 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

C. No original research:
All content is verifiable.--3family6 (Talk to me | See what I have done) 17:15, 14 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Is it broad in its coverage?
A. Major aspects:
All major aspects covered, uses summary style.--3family6 (Talk to me | See what I have done) 17:15, 14 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

B. Focused:
Focused on subject, no extraneous detail.--3family6 (Talk to me | See what I have done) 17:15, 14 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Is it neutral?
Fair representation without bias:
Neutral presentation, opinions are attributed to sources.--3family6 (Talk to me | See what I have done) 17:15, 14 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Is it stable?
No edit wars, etc:
Highly stable, no instances of disruptive editing since this article was created.--3family6 (Talk to me | See what I have done) 17:15, 14 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
The album cover is used within fair use policy, and has appropriate rationale.--3family6 (Talk to me | See what I have done) 17:15, 14 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
The album cover is essential to the article, and is used appropriately.--3family6 (Talk to me | See what I have done) 17:15, 14 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Overall: Passed.--3family6 (Talk to me | See what I have done) 17:15, 14 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Pass or Fail:
Note: The nominator told me that they will be without internet access for a bit and can't respond to comments, so I am taking my time at reviewing this article.--3family6 (Talk to me | See what I have done) 15:37, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]