Talk:New Hampshire Historical Society
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
Criticisms
[edit]Would the person who added the criticisms at the head of the article please defend 1) what may be confusing or unclear to some readers and 2) why I might have a conflict of interest? JJ (talk) 19:17, 7 November 2010 (UTC)
- I do apologise, that does appear to be myself, although I have no recollection of adding the tags in question... strange. In any case, I've removed the tags. They were seemingly unfounded. As for the others, I've let them stand, simply as they are relevant. Also, they do tend to alert other users to potential problems with the page, encouraging collaborative working IE finding sources, re-writing sections, etc. I will try to work on the article when I have some spare time, however the weekend has been rather hectic, and my internet connection keeps dropping off... *sigh*. Nevertheless, I will try to find some sources and rewrite the article in the very near future. Again, I do apologise for the errors. Robotnick2 Messages? 22:52, 7 November 2010 (UTC)
- I appreciate your willingness to eliminate unfounded comments. I also appreciate your willingness to "roll up your sleeves" and get to work on this article. That indicates to me that you want to be part of the solution and not just part of the problem. Thanks.JJ (talk) 15:18, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
- I've placed the article on a subpage of my userspace, and have made some quick edits to it today. Hopefully it can be improved further (Do feel free to edit it as you wish). I am, however, having trouble finding 3rd party sources... all the references I have are from the society's website itself, and a quick Google turned up almost nothing of interest. I will, however, keep trying :-) Robotnick2 Messages? 17:21, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
- I appreciate your willingness to eliminate unfounded comments. I also appreciate your willingness to "roll up your sleeves" and get to work on this article. That indicates to me that you want to be part of the solution and not just part of the problem. Thanks.JJ (talk) 15:18, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
Architecture
[edit]It would be nice to include some discussion of the society's historic building. Who designed it? What style? Etc. FloridaArmy (talk) 01:26, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
Copyright problem removed
[edit]
Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://nhhs.mainememory.net/page/2793/display.html https://www.nhhistory.org/About-Us/Mission https://www.nhhistory.org/About-Us/Opportunities/Employment. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, provided it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. GreenLipstickLesbian (talk) 21:32, 5 July 2024 (UTC)