Talk:New German Critique

Germany Low‑importance

	Germany portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Academic Journals, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Academic Journals on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Academic JournalsWikipedia:WikiProject Academic JournalsTemplate:WikiProject Academic JournalsAcademic Journal articles
See WikiProject Academic Journals' writing guide for tips on how to improve this article.

Pros and Cons per Speedy Deletion

I've just inserted the heading above. --Ludvikus (talk) 19:23, 25 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

"Widely considered the top journal in its field" [1].

"New German Critique is the leading journal of German Studies" JSTOR [2] This is more than enough to cruise pass any AfD M0RD00R (talk) 19:20, 25 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy keep. Tagging to delete was arbitrary, capricious and unreasonable. This is an important German scholarly journal where the world-class scholar, Michael Hagemeister, just published his article on the anonymous authorship of the most important antisemitic text, the Protocols of the Elders of Zion. --Ludvikus (talk) 19:28, 25 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Here are the seven (7) notables on its staff (Seven Wonders of the World):

2. Jack Zipes (Minneapolis),

3. Peter Gordon (Cambridge, Mass.),

4. David Levin (Chicago),

7. Eric Santner (Chicago).

It is a JSTOR journal. --Ludvikus (talk) 22:36, 25 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
It should be noted that none of the above establishes notability under any guideline in force or proposed at this moment. --Crusio (talk) 23:47, 7 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]