Talk:New Generation Wrestling

	New Generation Wrestling is within the scope of WikiProject Professional wrestling, an attempt to improve and standardize articles related to professional wrestling. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, visit the project to-do page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to discussions.Professional wrestlingWikipedia:WikiProject Professional wrestlingTemplate:WikiProject Professional wrestlingProfessional wrestling articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Yorkshire Low‑importance

	Yorkshire portal New Generation Wrestling is within the scope of WikiProject Yorkshire, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Yorkshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project, see a list of open tasks, and join in discussions on the project's talk page.YorkshireWikipedia:WikiProject YorkshireTemplate:WikiProject YorkshireYorkshire articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

National Promotion

I'm not sure NGW qualifies as a national promotion in Britain. The rest on the list seem to be pretty agreeable, ICW are national, as are RevPro and Progress, and there is zero arguement about All Star; but NGW should really be placed as notible independent. They only run shows in Hull (and Liverpool), and are certainly not Nationally known... Not more than any other promotions.

Let me know what you think, but if not I'm changing this to notible independent. Lee Vilenski(talk) 15:32, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (February 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on New Generation Wrestling. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:04, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Backstage politics and egos

Are these references for real or is/are the writers of this article trying to work the Wikipedia readers? The tone feels like someone either has a real grudge or is using this article as part of an angle Esspeecy (talk) 10:51, 14 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Article needs a full rewrite. It's a massive promo at the moment. I've done the lede, as it was citing how good it was to a primary source :/ Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 11:06, 14 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]