Jump to content

Talk:New Generation Party (Romania)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Description

[edit]

I put in "Christian democratic" to describe the party because its own statute ([1]) speaks of "promovarea valorilor creştin-democrate, a intereselor naţionale, precum şi a pluralismului politic" ("the promotion of Christian democratic values, of national interests, and also of political pluralism"). So while they are nationalists, they also claim to stand for democratic and Christian values at the same time. Whether they are "actually" fascists who moderate their rhetoric in order to win votes remains to be seen until they make it into government. Until then, we should rely on their words and their deeds, both of which seem to indicate commitment to Christian democracy, albeit of a more nationalistic bent. Biruitorul 00:52, 8 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I think it's better like that. I think apart from Gigi Becali, whose doctrine is clearly neo-fascist, PNG-CD's doctrine has been quite low profile and undefined. Becali's deeds so far indicate he is far from being a Christian democrat, but I really don't know enough about the other representatives of the party (Ciontu, for example, who is also a PNG-CD member, can be defined as a Christian democrat). In any case, I've moved the article to its new, official title. Ronline 06:25, 8 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Sounds good. I'll be fixing the redirects. Biruitorul 01:11, 9 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Personally , I'd rather classify PNG as capitalist , before democrat , christian or (hah) fascist 80.97.242.18 (talk) 05:38, 9 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:PNG logo small.png

[edit]

Image:PNG logo small.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 00:34, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Colour

[edit]

the colours of the party are green and light blue. someone who knows how to do that should do that chance in the wiki database!

ES Vic (talk) 11:58, 22 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on New Generation Party (Romania). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:03, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]