Talk:New Economics Party

	New Zealand portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New Zealand, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New Zealand and New Zealand-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New ZealandWikipedia:WikiProject New ZealandTemplate:WikiProject New ZealandNew Zealand articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the New Zealand politics task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Politics: Political parties Low‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Political parties task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Notability

This party meets the notability criteria for NZ political parties because it is running candidates in the upcoming general election. --IdiotSavant (talk) 01:58, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I agree it is worth keeping, but it needs to be expanded upon. Meatsgains (talk) 02:05, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

That's why you create a stub :). But there's usually some coverage of minnow and unregistered parties during the campaign; I'll just have to keep an eye out for it.--IdiotSavant (talk) 03:50, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I've removed the WP:Prod because the party had candidates in the 2008 general election and is contesting the 2011 general election. The Prod reasoning of there not being independent sources is wrong, as the New Zealand Electoral Commission is cited. Schwede 66 20:23, 8 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The New Zealand Electoral Commission reference is to a database entry created when the party fielded a candidate. This is not an independent source. Stuartyeates (talk) 20:35, 8 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If the Electoral Commission isn't an independent and definitive source of who is running in an election, then no-one is (after all, where do you think newspapers get their information from? The Electoral Commission. Though if you'd prefer a laundered source, there's one here).

We have a policy of including all NZ parties that run candidates. This party is running a candidate. I am hoping that there will be other media coverage during the campaign to link to to expand this article (usually there are "meet the candidates" articles). At the least, we will have a final vote tally afterwards (though that will also come from the Electoral Commission).--IdiotSavant (talk) 01:06, 9 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

First media mention; unfortunately no useable detail: [1]

External links modified (February 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on New Economics Party. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:19, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]