Talk:New Conservatism (China)

This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

China

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related articles

Politics

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles

Conservatism

	Conservatism portal This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Conservatism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of conservatism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ConservatismWikipedia:WikiProject ConservatismTemplate:WikiProject ConservatismConservatism articles
	This redirect has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

This article was nominated for deletion on 21 February 2009 (UTC). The result of the discussion was speedy close.

This article was nominated for deletion on 21 February 2009 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep.

Suggest deletion

I looked up 新保守主义 in a Google search and every article used the term to refer to American neo-conservatism.

Joseph Fewsmith and several others used the term when writing about China, but no writers have used the term since 2003, when the term neo-conservative became widely used to refer to an American political current.

This article should be deleted. The Four Deuces (talk) 12:54, 29 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Suggest re-naming article to "New Conservatism (People's Republic of China)"mentioning that it has also been translated as "Neo-conservatism", and place in past tense. Also need more names, date, policies. The Four Deuces (talk) 07:39, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have now made those changes. The Four Deuces (talk) 19:21, 10 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Completely redundant with the § in Conservatism

Which is a better reason to either delete or expand it. I would prefer the latter but someone else will have to do it. A conservative resolution would be to reduce the text there and at least update the text here to y2k10. 72.228.177.92 (talk) 21:03, 30 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It was one of a number of schools of thought in modern China. I nominated it for deletion but the author was able to provide evidence of the school's existence. However no one has attempted to improve the article. If anyone wants to improve the article, the deletion discussion provides links to sources. The Four Deuces (talk) 21:34, 30 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Chinese text

I tried googling the Chinese text in the article, and as of the time of writing, still refers to American neoconservatism. What's the point of the Chinese text then? It's not used at all in China.

In any case, I get the feeling that this so-called "new conservatism" is kind of the mainstream opinion held by most Chinese people, so giving it a specific name isn't particularly fitting, since it can't account for gradual modifications to this mindset that aren't usually seen in more extreme ideologies, such as the American neo-conservatism, which is far more well-defined by its followers than any mainstream ideology could ever be. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.149.159.247 (talk) 04:03, 15 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Try googling scholarly literature:

Suisheng Zhao: Chinese nationalism and its international orientations, p. 17. [1]

Chen Zhimin: Nationalism, Internationalism and Chinese Foreign Policy, p. 50. [2]

Josef Fewsmith: Neoconservatism and the End of the Dengist Era, pp. 642-651 [3] --Nongbulinqing (talk) 16:26, 16 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

"Neoconservatism" (新保守主义) is used quite a few times on the Baike Baidu page for neoauthoritarianism. —Nizolan ^{(talk · c.)} 00:01, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on New Conservatism (China). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050308025734/http://www.chinatoday.com.cn/English/e2005/e200503/p14.htm to http://www.chinatoday.com.cn/English/e2005/e200503/p14.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:00, 9 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]