Talk:New Buffalo station

Michigan Low‑importance

	Michigan portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Michigan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Michigan on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MichiganWikipedia:WikiProject MichiganTemplate:WikiProject MichiganMichigan articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Trains: Stations Low‑importance

Trains Portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This article is supported by WikiProject Stations.

New article?

Given that these are physically separate stations, are two articles warranted? Mackensen (talk) 03:00, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Pere Marquette

Why did the Pere Marquette cease stopping at this station? Was ridership too low even for Amtrak? Something should be added to the article about why the Pere Marquette ceased stopping here. --Criticalthinker (talk) 13:42, 28 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Criticalthinker: The new station is on a different route; it would not be physically possible for the Pere Marquette to stop here without an expensive connection east of the city between the ex-C&O and the ex-Michigan Central. I think that's noted in the article, but it's a bit vague. Mackensen (talk) 13:51, 28 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I looked it up just after I typed that. Still, why was the station moved to the Blue Water and Wolverine lines? I imagine it's because of higher ridership than what the Pere Marquette could offer, but it'd be nice to be sure. I think it's important for the article. --Criticalthinker (talk) 13:55, 28 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I'm going to start looking for that. My recollection is that a local developer stepped up with the money as part of a larger project, and that the increased connections to Chicago and Detroit were more valuable than the connection to Holland and GR. I'll see what I can find. Mackensen (talk) 16:26, 28 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]