Talk:New Britain, Connecticut

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cities, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cities, towns and various other settlements on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CitiesWikipedia:WikiProject CitiesTemplate:WikiProject CitiesWikiProject Cities articles

Connecticut Top‑importance

	Connecticut portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Connecticut, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Connecticut on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ConnecticutWikipedia:WikiProject ConnecticutTemplate:WikiProject ConnecticutConnecticut articles
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

Hi -- This is a nice start on the Wikipedia entry for New Britain, Conn. There's nice section on the city's Polish community, but no real history about the city, no discussion of the city's other ethnic communities. I'll read up on on how Wikipedia operates and see about building this out some. If anyone is interested in contacting me, send an email. I wrote the 1989 book, New Britain, City of Invention. I can be reached at dcblogs@gmail.com

Update, July 10, 2006. I put in list of very straight forward books about New Britain's history to supplement what earlier reference that someone (I don't know whom) put in about Camp's history. All my work was deleted by whoever, but yet the reference to Capitol Lunch remains. Seems a little self-promoting. Aren't there other restaurants with long established roots in the city? Meadowlands? Romas? East Side?

I don't know who removed the list, but I think that may have been done because it was out of place for the article. There may be a way to incorporate it in the form of a references section. As for the restaurants, feel free to edit the existing text and add more! Frankg 23:37, 10 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Cleanup

Polish Community section needs cleanup; it's POVed, with adresses of restaurants, shops etc....DONE

neclecting the other New Britain

What is it with only talking about New Britain's polish community?

While large, they aren't the majority, Puerto Ricans are probably more populous in New Britian now.

And what is it with the KKK? They were far from a major part of the city's history.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.182.233.230 (talk • contribs) 06:24, 9 August 2006

WHAT IS THE MATTER WITH YOU PEOPLE? WHAT ABOUT MR. WILLIE HALL?? HE PLAYED IN SUPER BOWL XI??

YOU PEOPLE ARE VERY DISRESPECTFUL. BUT OUR MOTHER RAISED ALL OF US BETTER THAN THAT.....—Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.210.248.44 (talk • contribs) 02:54, 27 December 2006

Of course they are going to talk about the Polish community. It is unique. The Polish population is a huge and important part of the city. Have you ever been to Broad Street. Even the police speak Polish. Credit is due to the Polish for cleaning up parts of New Britain —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.248.28.112 (talk • contribs) 23:42, 19 June 2007

I agree, the Polish section is completely unsourced and excessively long, much more so than warranted, and makes the entire article seemingly Polish-centric. Most of it is complete nonsense and sounds like it was added by a Polish supremacist.

Since it's been more than three years and no one has cleaned it up, I'm removing the entire thing. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.60.4.90 (talk) 03:36, 20 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

That's a little radical, as the Polish are a major part of New Britain. The section was pretty hyped, but did include a citation and no one ever tagged anything SPECIFIC to clean up. So I've added back about 25% of it, with CN tags. I'll see about getting a few more citations into the body. Best, Markvs88 (talk) 15:37, 20 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Fair enough, I never realized there was such a large Polish community when I lived there, but perhaps that is because I was young.

I'll do the same. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.60.4.90 (talk) 00:09, 21 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Lets not forget that there was a high Irish population in the city in the late 1800's and early 1900's. Ralelen (talk) 05:53, 1 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:New britain seal.jpg

Image:New britain seal.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 16:56, 4 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Done—Elipongo (Talk|contribs) 10:23, 10 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Bees

Technically they can't be called "minor league" unless they are affiliated with Major League Baseball; and they are not. The previous team in NB was Minor League. Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.179.187.53 (talk) 22:22, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on New Britain, Connecticut. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:14, 9 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]