Talk:New Anticapitalist Party

Socialism Low‑importance

	Socialism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Socialism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of socialism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SocialismWikipedia:WikiProject SocialismTemplate:WikiProject Socialismsocialism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Politics: Political parties Low‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Political parties task force (assessed as Low-importance).

France Low‑importance

	France portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FranceWikipedia:WikiProject FranceTemplate:WikiProject FranceFrance articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Was LCR really bigger than LO?

The article implies the LCR was bigger than LO. Technically on membership this will be true, but LO is much much stricter on membership criteria. Many LCR members would be just supporters/contacts for the LO. 129.67.160.30 (talk) 22:57, 4 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know whether it was "bigger" (I don't think so), but it was stronger in terms of political influence. This is probably what is meant here... --Ian fr (talk) 11:19, 7 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Democratic socialist

The party expressly states its commitment to democratic (indeed participatory democratic) politics, so it needs to be classified as a democratic socialist party. It also expressly states it does not argue for nor against revolution or reform, so it cannot be described as a "revolutionary socialist" organisation. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.136.106.161 (talk) 03:28, 10 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Although this question will be decided next week at the conference (where I will be a delegate), what you say is not accurate. The latest draft of the "founding principles" calls for "social revolution" and there is little doubt that this will be passed. However, of course, for most NPA people, like myself, "revolutionary" and "democratic" are absolutely not incompatible. Johncmullen1960 (talk) 09:04, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Language policy

What is their language policy? I couldn't find anything on their site. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.129.232.136 (talk) 23:19, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I can't quite remember, but I think there was a sentence about defending the rights of minority languages passed into one of the documents. The final versions of the four documents should be on the official web site in a few days Johncmullen1960 (talk) 13:39, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

slogans

I wasn't quite sure how to deal with the sentence "muslim supporters of the NPA were noted to shout slogans with islamic connotations". This is simply untrue, and the reference does not say this. Johncmullen1960 (talk) 16:32, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (February 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on New Anticapitalist Party. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090227142235/http://www.lemonde.fr/web/chat/0,46-0@2-823448,55-1064324,0.html?xtor=RSS-3208 to http://www.lemonde.fr/web/chat/0,46-0@2-823448,55-1064324,0.html?xtor=RSS-3208

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:21, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]