Talk:New Again/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Kees08 (talk · contribs) 03:56, 13 May 2017 (UTC)

Rate	Attribute	Review Comment
1. Well-written:
	1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct.	Remove the comma: New Again, was recorded in October The commas make it a little jarring, maybe break it into multiple sentences or try to reword it: Matthew Fazzi, formerly of Facing New York, who had joined the band in early 2008, was praised by vocalist Adam Lazzara and the group's manager for incorporating new instruments into the group's sound. Probably just me being stupid, but I don't understand this (after the final track was recorded, or after the final track what? (rereading, i think you just have to take out the commas for it to make sense)): After the final track, "Everything Must Go," was made available for streaming, the band toured the US in May and June. The 'as well as reaching' part of this sentence sounds off - New Again sold 48,000 copies in its first week of release, charting at number 7 on the Billboard 200, as well as reaching the top 10 on several other Billboard charts. I think it should be was instead of were - In December, Rubano said the group were in Let's break this up into multiple sentences: Lazzara sorted his life out following addiction issues, and the end of his engagement to Chauntelle DuPree of Eisley, and moved to another town, married, and had a child.
	1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation.	In the infobox, the studios might look a little better with linebreaks between each one?
2. Verifiable with no original research:
	2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline.
	2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose).
	2c. it contains no original research.
	2d. it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism.	Only quotes, so its all good.
3. Broad in its coverage:
	3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic.	Did it? - The album is set to be released on vinyl in April 2017.
	3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).
	4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.
	5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
	6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content.	Took me a minute to realize that the band took one of the photos, and that was their account. All good there though.
	6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.
	7. Overall assessment.

I addressed the comments you put On Hold in these edits.[1][2][3] Yeepsi (talk) 10:03, 25 June 2017 (UTC)

Checked the sources today. Sorry this took so long, it really got a bit out of hand...combination of IRL busyness and lack of motivation to complete the review for some reason. Quality work as always, thanks for your work in the pop punk scene! Kees08 (Talk) 21:24, 5 July 2017 (UTC)