Talk:NewSong

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christian music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christian music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Christian musicWikipedia:WikiProject Christian musicTemplate:WikiProject Christian musicChristian music articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

CLEANUP

PLEASE CLEAN UP THIS ARTICLE!!! IT IS DEFINITELY WORTH SPENDING TIME ON!!!! THANKS Later!!! Chili14 (Talk) 22:11, 22 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

What is wrong with it?67.191.245.254 21:33, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Made changes.

I made some changes to this article. I restructured some of the sentences, deleted a few parts that just said which song was made and when it was released, and divided the article into sections. It still needs a lot of work. It has a lot of information, but not about the group personally. -Kerplunk- 05:27, 12 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

What seems to be the problem

I am the one who wrote the article and do not see what needs to be cleaned up. However, I do think the group needs some overdue recognition, so I would like to help in any way possible. Please let me know what I can do. Thanks. (Winston09 02:07, 7 March 2007 (UTC))[reply]

It was super hard to read in November, and it still needs more work. The sectioning helped quite a bit. It certainly could use more wikilinks to other articles. Infoboxes on CDs and singles would help the eyeballs. Sometimes it goes into details that don't seem necessary. Royalbroil^T : C 02:42, 7 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Genre

I'm thinking we should add 'Gospel music' to the genre section; their early albums had a heavy gospel overtone. Toa Nidhiki05 18:58, 8 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fine, as long as you keep Contemporary Christian Music. Royal broil 00:09, 12 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Not Christian rock though. No sources to support that. Walter Görlitz (talk) 22:02, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

NPOV

The phrase "...always have had a heart for..." seems to be a little too emotionally charged to fit into the NPOV language definition. Blah2 (talk) 19:29, 24 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. Please edit it. Anyone can. Royal broil 13:04, 25 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on NewSong. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20070818031202/http://library.norweld.lib.oh.us/Pemberville/files/NY_Times_Lists/NYtimes2002.pdf to http://library.norweld.lib.oh.us/pemberville/files/NY_Times_Lists/NYtimes2002.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 19:29, 10 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on NewSong. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:08, 30 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]