Talk:Neville Roy Singham

The use of the contentious topics procedure has been authorised by the community for pages related to Uyghurs, Uyghur genocide, or topics that are related to Uyghurs or Uyghur genocide, including this page. Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be sanctioned.

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

Sri Lanka Low‑importance

	Sri Lanka portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sri Lanka, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Sri Lanka on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Sri LankaWikipedia:WikiProject Sri LankaTemplate:WikiProject Sri LankaSri Lanka articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

It is requested that a photograph be included in this article to improve its quality.
The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

Uyghur propaganda investigation

Recent news article https://newlinesmag.com/reportage/the-big-business-of-uyghur-genocide-denial/ probably should make it in here. Need to double-check New Lines' general reliability as a source: founded in 2020, so it's a recent publication and thus I wouldn't assume reliability the way I would for a more tenured publication. Core claim:

[O]ver the past five years almost $65 million has filtered through various entities connected with people who have defended the Chinese government and downplayed or denied documented human rights violations committed by Beijing against the Uyghur and Turkic Muslim minorities. This funding has moved through a complex series of mostly tax-deductible investment funds and charities, all linked by virtue of their governance structures to one man: the 67-year-old American tech magnate Neville Roy Singham.

Potential new source

Bredderman, William (29 May 2023). "U.S Tech Mogul Bankrolls Pro-Russia, Pro-China News Network". The Daily Beast. Retrieved 31 May 2023.

BobFromBrockley (talk) 15:22, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Added Superb Owl (talk) 20:07, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Where he lives

Shouldn't we mention where he lives in this article? Doesn't he live in mainland China? 173.88.246.138 (talk) 05:26, 2 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

done Superb Owl (talk) 20:07, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Opinion or fact?

Singham has helped fund causes and groups that promote pro-Chinese government messages, and others which oppose NATO expansion and U.S. aid to Ukraine in response to the Russian invasion.

Without neutral phrasing and corroborating reference, it becomes an opinion and not fact. And it is libel. I made this change, but an editor changed it back. So my question is, is Wikipedia going to give opinions on people now? especially living ones? Simplyarnab (talk) 17:23, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

For me, the Ukraine bit is not clearly verified in the article, and I don't see that in the NYT article either. Simplyarnab, you are incorrect: it was neutrally phrased, and whether it's a fact or not is actually not dependent on tone. Drmies (talk) 17:27, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
1. tone matters, because it creates perception. Hence the difference between editorial content and news reports. Wikipedia cannot take an editorial approach.

2. There is no fact without documented corroboration. And for events that are still unfolding, there is NO FACT, only what has been reported.

Anyways, this issue seems to have been resolved as more edits have been made to the page. So I consider the matter resolved. Simplyarnab (talk) 19:38, 5 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]