Talk:Nevel Gracias

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Nevel Gracias article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Biography: Actors and Filmmakers / Musicians

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by WikiProject Actors and Filmmakers (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Musicians (assessed as Low-importance).

Musical Theatre

Nevel Gracias is part of WikiProject Musical Theatre, organized to improve and complete musical theatre articles and coverage on Wikipedia. You can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.Musical TheatreWikipedia:WikiProject Musical TheatreTemplate:WikiProject Musical TheatreMusical Theatre articles

India: Goa / Music Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Goa (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article is supported by the Indian music workgroup (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article was last assessed in February 2023.

Composers

This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Composers, a group of editors writing and developing biographical articles about composers of all eras and styles. The project discussion page is the place to talk about technical and editorial issues and exchange ideas. New members are welcome!ComposersWikipedia:WikiProject ComposersTemplate:WikiProject ComposersComposers articles

Christianity: India / Catholicism Low‑importance

	Christianity portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Christianity in India (assessed as Low-importance).
	Catholic Church portal This article is supported by WikiProject Catholicism (assessed as Low-importance).

"limelight"

@Rejoy2003: as you have continued to refuse to start this discussion despite being asked multiple times, I'm going to start. The sources given do not support the phrase "however he ensured that his lenten tiatrs were brought to limelight even at times from his hospital bed". Your edit-summary of "he ensured that his lenten tiatr saw the light of the day". Several other sources also have mentioned him working from his hospital bed" shows two issues. First, source 20 isn't mentioned. You, the editor adding this, have the WP:BURDEN of making sure material challenged is supported by the sources for that material. That source isn't even close to what was challenged. Second, WP:SYNTH applies, you are taking material from multiple sources and combining them. One source needs to support the entire line. Not multiple. Also, "light of day" does not equal "limelight", that's pure puffery and exaggeration. Stop pushing this, I will end up taking this to WP:EW if you continue. This is disruptive editing. Ravensfire (talk) 13:32, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm, I did mention ref 20 and it was valid untill I made further edits which pushed the source to another number, so not misleading or anything. Like it's mentioned in Times of India, "he ensured that his lenten tiatr saw the light of the day", from what I added was "limelight". There might be a bit of a grammar issue or statement might seem fluffery as you claim, it's not puffery intended, not that I want to be. You seem to be familiar with my work, I never copy paste content from sources as I prefer to add my own words, as it should be. So from what I can see is, calm down and I'll use the exact statement mentioned in TOI, which I have mentioned above. Rejoy2003 14:00, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Fine. It's still borderline puffery, but I'm glad you finally actually discussed this on the article talk page instead of pushing over and over. There is a substantial difference between "limelight" and "light of day". You can't be pushing phrases when you don't understand the difference between them. Next time, follow BRD and start the talk page discussion after the first revert and ask. Ravensfire (talk) 14:10, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]