Talk:Nevada State Route 564

Nevada State Route 564 has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: March 11, 2014. (Reviewed version).

U.S. Roads: State highways / Nevada Mid‑importance

	U.S. roads portal This article is within the scope of the U.S. Roads WikiProject, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to state highways and other major roads in the United States. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.U.S. RoadsWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. RoadsTemplate:WikiProject U.S. RoadsU.S. road transport articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
Topics	U.S. state highways
Locations	Nevada
	This article has a map. If the file has an error, please work with the Maps department to correct it.
	This article has a junction list compliant with the Manual of Style on road junction lists.
	This article has a KML file. If the file has an error, please work with the Maps department to correct it.

Nevada (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Nevada, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.NevadaWikipedia:WikiProject NevadaTemplate:WikiProject NevadaNevada articles

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Nevada State Route 564/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Yellow Evan (talk · contribs) 00:23, 6 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ill review this very soon. Y E ^Pacific ^Hurricane 00:23, 6 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

"The route was designated in 2002, replacing a portion of SR 146." what does "SR" stand for? I know, but my nextdoor neighbor may not. Y E ^Pacific ^Hurricane 00:55, 6 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Abbreviation already mentioned in the lead.—CycloneIsaac–E-Mail 02:32, 6 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

"After entering the center of Henderson, SR 564 turns northeast near residential areas." mention it passed south of Lake Las Vegas. Y E ^Pacific ^Hurricane 00:55, 6 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done.—CycloneIsaac–E-Mail 02:32, 6 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I'd note that SR564 passes through the Boulder Strip. Y E ^Pacific ^Hurricane 00:55, 6 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done.—CycloneIsaac–E-Mail 02:32, 6 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I actually wouldn't note this. The extents of the Boulder Strip are not really defined in the geographic sense, such that this note is meaningful to the reader. The "Boulder Strip" (as linked in the article) refers more to the gaming area as defined by the Nevada Gaming Commission, which encompasses casinos further north on Boulder Highway than where SR 564 crosses it. -- LJ ↗ 04:51, 6 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, removed.—CycloneIsaac–E-Mail 22:46, 7 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

"Around 52,500 vehicles travel on the highway near its western terminus on average each day.[3]" what about on the eastern terminus? Y E ^Pacific ^Hurricane 00:55, 6 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

An AADT quoted from the eastern side would show the disparity. -- LJ ↗ 04:51, 6 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Adding later.—CycloneIsaac–E-Mail 01:11, 9 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe add stuff from 146's article to the history section? YE ^Pacific ^Hurricane 00:55, 6 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Also note when all the SR146 signs had been taken down. Y E ^Pacific ^Hurricane 00:57, 6 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think there are adequate sources to indicate when the 146 signs were removed. -- LJ ↗ 04:51, 6 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

^ Yeah...I'm going to add a bit more history about SR 146 and 147.—CycloneIsaac–E-Mail 22:46, 7 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Any update on this? I'm close to passing this GAN, but given the articles lack of overall length, ill wait your done. Y E ^Pacific ^Hurricane 12:34, 10 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I'm just busy. Give me a couple more days...—CycloneIsaac–E-Mail 01:11, 11 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The Las Vegas Beltway was not completed to the I-515 interchange until 2006. Given that this road was designated in 2002, was 564 ever designated west of 515? Y E ^Pacific ^Hurricane 00:55, 6 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

2002-03 map already shows I-215 already finished. From the map, SR 564 was not extended west of I-515.—CycloneIsaac–E-Mail 02:32, 6 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The paper version of this map (and the 2005-06 version) show a dotted red line overlapping a divided highway line, indicating the freeway was under development when the map was printed. There was an interim surface-street connection using the existing SR 146 roadway between Stephanie Street and I-515 until the final freeway segment of I-215 and the system interchange at I-515 were completed in 2006. This was still signed as SR 146 until the freeway was complete. -- LJ ↗ 04:51, 6 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Do you still have the map, and cite it? I don't have the map. I'm looking in the newspapers for the date of the opening of the I-215/I-515 interchange.—CycloneIsaac–E-Mail 01:11, 9 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

IIRC it is sometime in summer 2006 (I know it was open for thru traffic but not finished during the 2005-06 school year), but I have no sources. Y E ^Pacific ^Hurricane 12:34, 10 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Okay.—CycloneIsaac–E-Mail 01:11, 11 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Cite for 2005-06 map: {{cite map |publisher=Nevada Department of Transportation |title=Official Highway Map of Nevada |date=2005 |cartography=Location Division |inset=Las Vegas Region}}
The 215/515 interchange wasn't fully completed until at least October (full open was scheduled for 10/24/05). Citation: {{cite news |last=Christensen |first=Nick |date=October 8, 2005 |title=I-215, U.S. 95 interchange nears completion |url=http://www.lasvegassun.com/news/2005/oct/08/i-215-us-95-interchange-nears-completion/ |newspaper=[[Las Vegas Sun]] |location= |publisher=[[Greenspun Media Group]] |accessdate=March 10, 2014 }}. -- LJ ↗ 03:05, 11 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I added it.—CycloneIsaac–E-Mail 21:59, 11 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]