Talk:Neutron/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: StringTheory11 (talk · contribs) 04:46, 14 June 2012 (UTC)
I will review this article. StringTheory11 04:46, 14 June 2012 (UTC)
- I am sorry, but I will have to quick-fail this article due to a SEVERE lack of sources and bad prose. I feel that I have to downgrade this article to a C, which I have done. StringTheory11 18:01, 17 June 2012 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
- Is it reasonably well written?
- Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
- A. References to sources:
- B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
- C. No original research:
- A. References to sources:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. Major aspects:
- B. Focused:
- A. Major aspects:
- Is it neutral?
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- Is it stable?
- No edit wars, etc:
- Requesting semi-protection due to vandalism
- No edit wars, etc:
- Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
- Pass or Fail:
A few preliminary points to work on:
- There is a citation needed in the lead. This will need to be fixed.
- The references in the "further reading" section are not complete.
- Refs 1, 2, 8, 10-13, and 17 need to be more than bare URLs.
- Many refs need access dates.
- This article has many unreferenced paragraphs. I am of the opinion that every paragraph should have at least one reference before an article is a GA.
- I would rename "sources" to "natural sources", and move all artificial source info into "production". Also, the section needs to be expanded.
- Many subsections in "intrinsic properties" are too short to comfortably be sections. I believe that if a section only has one paragraph, it is not worthy of a section. Either expand these or merge then with other sections.
- "Neutron compounds" should be a subsection of "intrinsic properties".
More to come later. StringTheory11 04:21, 16 June 2012 (UTC)