Talk:Neuroethology

Physiology Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physiology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physiology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysiologyWikipedia:WikiProject PhysiologyTemplate:WikiProject PhysiologyPhysiology articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.
	This article has been classified as relating to the physiology of the brain, nerves and nervous system.

Animals High‑importance

Neuroethology is within the scope of WikiProject Animals, an attempt to better organize information in articles related to animals and zoology. For more information, visit the project page.AnimalsWikipedia:WikiProject AnimalsTemplate:WikiProject Animalsanimal articles

High

This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Animals To-do:

Here are some Open Tasks :

Copyedit:
Merge: GLAM/ARKive donated texts into articles about endangered species.
Improve: Photoperiodism, Tool use by non-human animals, Omnivore, Animal suicide, Sphaerium beckmani (a species in family Sphaeriidae),
Requests:
- Mammals:
- Invertebrates: Campocraspedon
- Fishes: Zaniolepis frenata
Merge: GLAM/ARKive donated texts into articles about endangered species.
Expand: Junqueira cow, Atka mackerel
Nominate and vote: Science collaboration of the month, Article Improvement Drive, WikiProject Animals Collaboration

Neuroscience High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Neuroscience, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Neuroscience on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NeuroscienceWikipedia:WikiProject NeuroscienceTemplate:WikiProject Neuroscienceneuroscience articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

BioNB424 Neuroethology Discussion

Here is an area where we can try to coordinate our edits to the Neuroethology wikipedia article. Please try to use this to work out any differences in opinion over edits so that people have a sense of what our line of thinking was. Cheers, Jasongallant 16:04, 2 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to add in your comments, just type them in after this post and sign your name by typing four tildes. Cheers, Jasongallant 16:15, 2 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

For the history section, should it be broken up into "Ethology" and "Neurophysiology?" Additionally, how much background on the notable ethologists/neurophysiologists is relevant and necessary? Serpentnirvana 23:32, 5 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I agree- I think that the history section could be broken down that way. As for background on particular people, I think brief mention on them would be good, and perhaps creation of a [WP:STUB | Stub] for these people might be a good idea. Perhaps they will be filled in by others from the class or ambitious wikipedians?

Jasongallant 18:20, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

We now have a Neuroethology Project Page! Feel free to check it out! Jasongallant 19:42, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Is there a separate place where Prof. Hopkins said we should put our reasons for editing certain things, etc? Thanks, and great job, Jason, with putting the other WikiProject page together, though some of the links are not functioning. Bibliakim 05:11, 9 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

When Prof. Hopkins says "add this" to a certain section; i.e. the intro paragraph, does that mean to replace the whole paragraph or try to incorporate my version into what's there already? Please let me know. Thanks. discclaimer 14:07, 9 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I wanted to make sure that I could do this. I added the new technology section. Katdonov (talk) 03:18, 20 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Zoology Banner

18 November 2009: It seems to me that the large banner devoted to Zoology is inappropriate on the Neuroethology page. One could argue that Neuroethology is a subset of Neuroscience, which includes psychology, neurobiology, linguistics, congnitive science, and neurology, rather than a subset of zoology. For that reason, I moved the large Zoology logo, which was something of a distractor, to the bottom of the page. Instead I replaced it with an image of an echolocating bat, which is more symbolic of one of the field of Neuroethology.

Perhaps by convention, the Zoology series pages always have the banner at the top of the page. In that case, would it be possible to remove the banner altogether and simply add a link to the Zoology pages? User:cdh8

Good reference

Alcock, John (2003): A textbook history of animal behaviour. Animal Behaviour 65: 3–10. doi:10.1006/anbe.2002.2044

Traces the history of behavioral biology, from classical ethology to sociobiology and neuroethology. Dysmorodrepanis (talk) 01:33, 16 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ethology banner

Should the Ethology banner be moved to the lead image? I feel it is more representative of Neoroethology than the echo-locating bat image, but did not want to change the image without discussion because it has been there for so long.__DrChrissy (talk) 20:35, 3 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I fully agree with you! Lova Falk talk 16:09, 15 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Differences between Behavioral Neurobiology and Neuroethology?

This sort of violates WP:FORUM so make responses short and sweet, please. :) My guess is the difference is moot and tied up in technicalities. See Talk:Behavioral neuroscience#Differences between Behavioral Neurobiology and Neuroethology?. <----

137.124.161.31 (talk) 21:36, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (February 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Neuroethology. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071006201121/http://www.tamie.org/insect.png to http://www.tamie.org/insect.png

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:22, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]