Talk:Neuengamme concentration camp

	Judaism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Jewish history, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Jewish history on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Jewish historyWikipedia:WikiProject Jewish historyTemplate:WikiProject Jewish historyJewish history-related articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Germany: Hamburg Mid‑importance

	Germany portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Hamburg portal This article is supported by the Hamburg task force (assessed as High-importance).

Correction and Detention Facilities (defunct)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Correction and Detention Facilities, a project which is currently considered to be defunct.Correction and Detention FacilitiesWikipedia:WikiProject Correction and Detention FacilitiesTemplate:WikiProject Correction and Detention FacilitiesCorrection and Detention Facilities articles

Inmates

The row Dead in Deportation and the sentence There was about 52% of dead people in all kommandos dépending on Neuengamme between December 13rd 1938 and May 4th 1945. seems to be incompletly translated from the orginal French. Could someone with better French than me please fix it? --JBellis 17:22, 31 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

"Many women prisoners from Auschwitz in 1944" any citation of how many? 159.105.80.141 13:56, 3 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

move article to "Neuengamme concentration camps"

this article should be renamed (moved) to: "Neuengamme concentration camps".

as it stands now, the article title does not reflect the article's contents. the current name misdirects by not addressing the camps. the article is only about the Neuengamme concentration camps. when someone interested in the holocaust sees the current title, he will not be informed that this is an important subject containting relevent info. wp policy is for the title to acurately convey the article. the name should be expanded to fully clarify the subject. thank you.-- diremarc_(talk) 17:14, 30 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

"Neuengamme concentration camp"

to be consistent with other camps, name change should be to "Neuengamme concentration camp".-- diremarc_(talk) 03:39, 1 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is archived. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.

The result was moved to Neuengamme concentration camp. Ruslik_Zero 18:54, 9 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move

Neuengamme → Neuengamme concentration camp —

to be consistent with other camps, name change should be to "Neuengamme concentration camp"
article's name does not accurately reflect article's contents:
1. the current name misdirects by not addressing the camps.
2. when someone interested in the holocaust sees the current title, he will not be informed that this is an important subject containting relevent info.
3. the article is only about the Neuengamme concentration camps.
4. wp policy is for the title to acurately convey the article. the name should be expanded to fully clarify the subject.

thank you -- diremarc_(talk) 07:52, 2 July 2009 (UTC)-- diremarc_(talk) 07:49, 2 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Support. This seems to be standard usage in Category:Nazi concentration camps, even for camps that are primary topic like Auschwitz and Herzogenbusch. Jafeluv (talk) 22:48, 5 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support per the above. Aubergine (talk) 01:17, 9 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support Neuengamme is a place in Hamburg, not per se a KZ. Just like Auschwitz and Herzogenbusch. KapHorn (talk) 09:15, 9 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.

Assessmant and review

Automated peer review by bot

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

Please expand the lead to conform with guidelines at Wikipedia:Lead. The article should have an appropriate number of paragraphs as is shown on WP:LEAD, and should adequately summarize the article.^[?]
You may wish to consider adding an appropriate infobox for this article, if one exists relating to the topic of the article. ^[?] (Note that there might not be an applicable infobox; remember that these suggestions are not generated manually) Doesn't apply here.
The script has spotted the following contractions: doesn't, if these are outside of quotations, they should be expanded. Couldn't find an n't.
As done in WP:FOOTNOTE, footnotes usually are located right after a punctuation mark (as recommended by the CMS, but not mandatory), such that there is no space in between. For example, the sun is larger than the moon [2]. is usually written as the sun is larger than the moon.[2]^[?] Done.
Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of Wikipedia's best work. See also User:Tony1/How to satisfy Criterion 1a.^[?]

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, Sebastian scha. (talk) 20:57, 3 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment

Fails coverage: even If you can't speak German see the German article in lenght and structure (including several sub-articles). So it fails
1. Structure too, ATM.
A few more souces of third parties would be nice.
Not all refs and footnote in the {citation} style. (minor)

Thank you. Sebastian scha. (talk) 20:57, 3 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Neuengamme concentration camp. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.bis.uni-oldenburg.de/bisverlag/taaang98/kap9.pdf
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.ushmm.org/wlc/media_cm.php?lang=en&ModuleId=10005539&MediaId=2538

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 17:58, 31 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Camp operated by the GERMANS

The camp was operated by the Germans. No one used the term 'Nazis' during the WW2. You may say German Nazi, or fascist German etc. but not Nazi alone as there was no Nazi nation in the world. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.12.188.154 (talk) 11:26, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

2015 10 05 Brotrechnung IMG 3462.JPG

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 03:43, 27 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]