Talk:Netsukuku - Wikipedia

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Networking task force (assessed as Low-importance).

oh cruel vida, por que no es netsukuku real? algo mas que un chiste muy elaborado! ok, hackers de todo el mundo unios!, vamos a crear a partir de esta broma algo real!

Ehi, it is real ;)

To me, it's just a hoax. Should be in wikipedia in the "jokes" category.

- No, it's a fantastic idea. Very far from a hoax, so maybe you're just a bit upset that people are making their own way to avoid the governments & corporations which are trying to control the internet, and restrict freedom of information? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.83.82.178 (talk) 01:05, 21 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

- USHHHHH! ...they're listening —Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.3.183.86 (talk) 11:39, 25 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

- come on, clearly it's hoax/joke. a sokal affair in thye field of p2p. garbage buzzwords but nothing else. I can't understand why it's surviving so long. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 138.231.80.20 (talk) 11:41, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Notability Thoughts

[edit]

This is a fairly informative, well-written article on a potentially important topic. Deleting this article would be a loss to Wikipedia. A quick google shows nearly twenty thousand hits. Any thoughts? Nave.notnilc (talk) 02:22, 26 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A cover story on Netsukuku has been published in the Italian Wired Magazine. This is significant coverage so I believe this removes the question of notability. AndreasBWagner (talk) 16:25, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Verification?

[edit]

I see this in the top 100 longest pages on the Interlingua wikipedia, but... I've never heard of it and there's nothing but first-party sources. Can anyone confirm anything about this? Almafeta (talk) 03:04, 29 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It's very real, Freaknet is quite a reputable source also. I do realize there is a lack of third-party sources however the youth and technical nature of the project contributes to this. I will attempt to cite some verifiable references.

Beefstake (talk) 05:03, 10 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It looks like there are sources, just that nobody has actually cited them. 92.78.236.239 (talk) 23:49, 10 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It appears to be real to me. It is possible, current hardware permits it and much of that hardware already exists and is underused. Given the amount of information on the website and after reading some of it i think its a bunch of people collaborating on something crazy that if it works has a certain chance of making it into history books one day. If they can deliver a working software, people will use it, for example in urban areas where people live in a high density and have a lot of high powered wireless routers. I would say for now lets just wait for a while, if the website stops being updated for a while this article can be deleted, when the first version of their software gets published we will know for sure. Even if its a hoax, someone might pick up that idea and turn it into reality, so i wouldnt care so much about deleting it while the topic is so hot and changing so quickly. If its a hoax, it will die down. 79.230.2.99 (talk) 23:43, 4 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Tone of voice

[edit]

This article sounds like a project description on sourceforge. It absolutely should be rewritten in the normal Wikipedia style, to gain any credibility with readers. Gwrede (talk) 20:14, 5 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

There's no point in rewriting it. It's rubbish technology - meaningless - and just needs a good AfD. --Gwern (contribs) 22:29 5 January 2010 (GMT)

External links modified

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Netsukuku. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 11:02, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]