Talk:Netley Castle

Netley Castle has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: September 12, 2015. (Reviewed version).

Hampshire High‑importance

	Hampshire portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hampshire, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Hampshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HampshireWikipedia:WikiProject HampshireTemplate:WikiProject HampshireHampshire articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history: Fortifications / Technology / British / European / Early Modern

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Associated task forces:
/
	Fortifications task force
	Military science, technology, and theory task force
	British military history task force
	European military history task force
	Early Modern warfare task force (c. 1500 – c. 1800)

Infobox inclusions: listed status

Should the listed building status be included in the infobox? It is in by default in a number of infobox templates for historic buildings and is an important piece of informaton about the subject. Murgatroyd49 (talk) 09:40, 9 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

No. Histories and other articles on Netley Castle make little or no reference to its listed building status, nor the date that it was given that status; it doesn't therefore appear to be a "key feature" of the article, which is the requirement described for inclusion under MOS:INFOBOX. Hchc2009 (talk) 18:19, 9 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

See my comment on Talk:Winchester Castle Murgatroyd49 (talk) 19:00, 9 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure the guidebook you refer to on Winchester Castle has direct relevance to this article...? Hchc2009 (talk) 19:10, 9 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Trying to avoid repetition Murgatroyd49 (talk) 19:15, 9 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

As nobody eles seems to be worried about this I will reinstate the listing information in a week's time Murgatroyd49 (talk) 11:54, 24 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I think it should be included. Listed status is often a key consideration when deciding whether or not a building is notable - as such, Wikipedia deems it a "key feature" even if some of the sources don't. Waggers TALK 10:05, 25 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]