Jump to content

Talk:Nethy Bridge

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This website is privately registered to "John Mcglinchey" and has been repeatedly added by the single-purpose account John c mcglinchey (talk · contribs) and then by an anonymous IP which is likely to be the same person due to this being the first contribution from this address. The website itself does not explain ownership, sponsorship, editorial control, sources or purpose and does not appear to be supported in any official capacity. I believe the site fails WP:ELNO and WP:SPS and should not be added to the article. (talk) 17:04, 21 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I agree that, per WP:ELNO, the website does not anything to the understanding of Nethy Bridge, so it should not be listed in the External links section. I'm a little more mixed with the link in the body of the text: it's bad karma to have a link in the body of text like that, but I think it's a reasonable link for the purpose of giving more information about the games, so I'm willing to let the link stay in the body of the article. —C.Fred (talk) 22:24, 21 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Why would you consider this self published source sufficient to meet the RS guidelines when there has been no explanation as to why it has been created or any evidence of independent review? I'll raise it for further comment on RSN as other views may be helpful here.
Raised at Wikipedia:RSN#http://abernethyhighlandgames.co.uk. (talk) 23:33, 21 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The website is the official Abernethy Highland Games web site, and it is also a non commercial web site. It is an events and information site with more detail about the Abernethy Highland Games. I am also the representitve of the Abernethy Highland Games, I hope this explains the genuine purpose of this link. This should eliminate any disputes. —Preceding unsigned comment added by John c mcglinchey (talkcontribs) 23:55, 21 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Could you point to any independent sources to support the official status of the website (a newspaper article would be ideal), or failing that a clear statement on the website of its official status and the nature of its authority? Thanks (talk) 23:58, 21 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I am the representitve to authenticate that it is indeed official. A news paper article is not a good enough source, however I will leave this up to Wikipedia to decide its authenticity, through my own user name. If you wish to challenge the website I suggest contacting the Abernethy Highland Games to authenticate. Thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by John c mcglinchey (talkcontribs) 00:10, 22 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Good for you, I'll take that as a no to my question then. Using LexisNexis I find 32 newspaper articles that mention the Games (mostly the Aberdeen Press and Journal), and though these include a number of contact names, none is yours and none mentions this website. I propose that until such a time as someone can verify that the website is the official website supported by the Abernethy Highland Games Association that it is removed from the article. The guidance of WP:BURDEN applies here. (talk) 00:33, 22 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
John c mcglinchey, you can submit a ticket at our OTRS system. If you are the legitimate representative and it is an official website, you will be able to prove it there, for instance by the OTRS rep getting an email from an official email address. That won't necessarily help you get the link onto the page, but for small towns there's leeway for associations and events that are regionally notable. Franamax (talk) 07:50, 22 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
It is indeed Franamax, an event. I will submit a ticket to OTRS system. This should eliminate any doubt! Thanks —Preceding unsigned comment added by John c mcglinchey (talkcontribs) 11:33, 22 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Is there an OTRS ticket number? (talk) 18:22, 27 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Nethy Bridge. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:14, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Nethy Bridge. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:25, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]